Governance architecture
Decision rights, responsibilities, information needs and governance priorities.
Discuss this scope →Four areas of expertise, shaped around the decisions your institution needs to make and the information your projects need to deliver. Clear scope. Tangible outputs.
Our institution needs a clearer path from ambition to decisions.
Define who decides, what evidence they need and how transformation is governed.
Dr. Manal Aladwani · overarching governance methodology and transformation direction
Decision rights, responsibilities, information needs and governance priorities.
Discuss this scope →Review how decisions are framed, evidenced and escalated; agree practical next steps.
Discuss this scope →Programme ownership, review gates and reporting requirements.
Discuss this scope →Review depth, diagnostics and implementation are agreed separately for each mandate.
Discuss an institutional challenge →Our project needs coordinated information that can be built and handed over.
Connect requirements, technical production and handover through accountable specialist delivery.
BIM MENA coordinates the mandate; BIM and engineering specialists deliver their agreed scopes
Information requirements, BIM execution planning, delivery standards and responsibility structure.
Discuss this scope →CDE operation; naming, classification and status coding; exchange control; MIDP and TIDP, aligned with applicable ISO 19650 principles.
Discuss this scope →LOD 200–500 discipline models, federation, clash management, issue control and acceptance.
Discuss this scope →Structural, architectural, civil and electromechanical packages integrated through the engineering delivery specialist.
Discuss this scope →Coordinated shop drawings, builder’s-work information, penetrations, supports and equipment access.
Discuss this scope →Sequence simulation linked to the programme; project and portfolio reporting within the agreed scope.
Discuss this scope →Record models reconciled against verified survey output, structured asset registers and handover information.
Discuss this scope →Asset information structure, classification and governance before platform selection.
Discuss this scope →Delivery is structured for each engagement. Technical disciplines remain with the named, appropriately qualified parties.
Discuss a BIM or engineering project →Explore the eight technical capabilities, the information lifecycle from requirements to FM-ready handover, executive governance and the delivery approach.
Explore the full technical capabilities →Our data needs to support a defined business decision.
Shape the decision system, evidence structure and solution requirements before committing to implementation.
Bader Alabddan · under the firm’s strategic direction
Map the decision, the evidence it needs and the people who use it.
Discuss this scope →Identify source gaps, structure requirements and review responsibilities.
Discuss this scope →Define the proposed solution, feasibility checks and a bounded next stage.
Discuss this scope →Data readiness, feasibility, responsibilities and acceptance criteria are agreed before any pilot or implementation.
Discuss a decision-intelligence need →Our people need the capability to sustain change.
Design learning programmes and curricula around institutional needs and intended learning outcomes.
Dr. Manal Aladwani with relevant subject specialists
Learning outcomes, programme architecture and context-specific session design.
Discuss this scope →Course structure, progression and assessment approach for institutional review.
Discuss this scope →Role-based materials and a proposed handover or facilitation plan.
Discuss this scope →Proposed offer definition for review: programme design, facilitation and curriculum work are separately scoped. No accreditation, adoption or delivery-results claim is made.
Discuss a programme or curriculum →Explore the original capability descriptions, delivery lifecycle and governance approach.