Eight capabilities that run as one thread — from the information requirements set at the beginning of a project to the structured asset information handed to the operator at the end.
Information requirements, BIM execution planning, delivery standards and the governance structure that holds a project's information to an institutional standard.
Common data environment operation, naming and classification, status coding, exchange control, MIDP and TIDP — aligned to ISO 19650 principles.
Discipline model development from LOD 200 through LOD 500, federation, clash management, issue control and model acceptance across every package.
Multidisciplinary structural, architectural, civil and electromechanical design brought into one coordinated information environment through the alliance.
Shop drawing production from coordinated models, builder's-work information, penetrations, supports and equipment-access documentation.
Sequence simulation linked to the delivery programme, plus portfolio and project dashboards that make status, readiness and risk legible to leadership.
Record models reconciled against verified survey output, structured asset registers, and a digital handover the operator can actually use.
Preparing asset information so an operational digital twin is possible — structure, classification and governance before platform selection.
Each stage is defined, evidenced and accepted before the next depends on it. That is what makes the handover at the end worth having.
Information requirements defined against how the asset will be built and operated.
Execution plan, common data environment, naming, classification and exchange control.
Discipline models federated, clash-managed and accepted at each gate.
Model-based construction documentation issued from the coordinated model.
Sequence simulation and project intelligence aligned to the reporting cycle.
Record information reconciled against verified site and survey output.
Structured asset information handed to the operator, not a folder of files.
Technical delivery is only half the problem. Above it sits the question of whether an institution's leadership can actually decide — with information it trusts, through a decision path that is clear, at the moment the decision is needed. BIM MENA works at that level as well, led by Dr. Manal Aladwani, with Bader Alabddan contributing decision-intelligence and AI-governance components.
How executive decisions are framed, evidenced, owned and closed — and where the friction sits in that path today.
Governance for transformation programmes, so investment in platforms follows a decision structure rather than preceding one.
Data governance and information reliability as the precondition for any decision leadership is asked to sign.
Whether the institution's information can responsibly carry AI, and the governance under which it would be adopted.
BIM and project information management treated as supporting tools for executive decisions — not as ends in themselves.
Structured executive sessions that surface leadership observations and priorities, closing with an indicative 90-day action roadmap.
The scope and depth of executive advisory are defined for each engagement, with any diagnostic, assessment or implementation work separately agreed.
Standards. Delivery is structured in alignment with applicable ISO 19650 principles and the project-specific information requirements and BIM execution plan.
Specialist delivery. Technical disciplines are performed by appropriately qualified and accountable parties within the governed delivery structure.
Every engagement begins with a confidential read of the asset, the information you already hold, and the accountability the project requires.
Discuss a project →